IT News

The factoring onboarding paradox: every step is necessary, the whole is often broken

Factoring onboarding is slow because the transitions between the departments depend on individual effort rather than system design. This article examines where those transitions break down and what an orchestration layer can do about it.

Written by:
Krystian Suchodolskiin

Krystian Suchodolski

Technical Business Consultant

More from this author
The factoring onboarding paradox: every step is necessary, the whole is often broken

Key takeaways

  • Each step in factoring onboarding works. The process as a whole still takes weeks because transitions between departments depend on individual effort rather than system design.
  • Client portals, e-signing, and online applications removed the friction within each step. The handoff problem (documents re-collected, context lost, data re-entered) remains structural.
  • An orchestration layer that validates documents at intake, routes cases between departments, and gives the COO real-time case visibility is where operational gain sits.

The onboarding sequence: multiple functions, one process

Factoring onboarding moves a new client through a defined sequence: deal origination, document collection, credit assessment, debtor verification, legal and contractual review, compliance and KYC, operations account setup, and finally account management handover.

In larger firms, these are separate departments with separate systems and separate queues. In smaller and mid-size operations, several functions may belong to the same person but the boundaries between them remain, and each handoff is a potential point of failure.

What the client sees

From the client's side, the sequence has one visible characteristic: opacity. Lara O'Connor Hodgson, CEO and former factoring client, described the experience in IFA Commercial Factor Q3 2025: "the back and forth was like watching a ball in a pinball machine bounce along wondering where it would come out... it was hard to manage my business when it took so much time to work through the tug o' war."

The description captures something that surfaces in customer reviews consistently – the client cannot see what stage their application is at, cannot predict when the next action is required of them, and cannot distinguish between "in progress" and "stuck in a queue."

Invoices Dispatch Case

Enhancing the architecture of an application that enables over 20 million invoices to be processed each day.

Read the case study →

The person-dependent workaround

Because the transitions between steps lack structural support, firms rely on individual drive to push files forward. Originators call credit analysts; underwriters email compliance officers; managers check in on operations. This makes the speed of onboarding dependent on the relationships and persistence of the individuals handling the file, rather than a design layout that handles operations continuously.

Where the process breaks

The transition failure is evident in the re-collection of client data. Information collected during origination is manually re-keyed into credit templates. Compliance requests the same entity documents that are already saved in the deal folder. Handing off from legal to operations requires checking spreadsheets to see what security limits were agreed. Each instance represents manual overhead, audit risk, and elapsed time that stretches the onboarding cycle.

Have an Idea?

Let's Build Something Amazing Together.